Last month, I stumbled upon Gig Performer after watching a ton of videos on YouTube. The concept of building custom rackspaces for live gigs totally blew me away! Hooked by Brett’s videos, I downloaded the demo, joined the forums, and spent the next few days diving in. I watched many of the live streams, created my rackspaces, and tried to learn and write some scripts myself. The initial welcome from the community was fantastic, and I felt right at home after years in the Kronos communities.
I was particularly interested in using scripting for automation, but unfortunately, I encountered some noticeable latency issues with scriptlets. Determined to find a solution, I created a forum post last month to see if others had experienced similar problems. Initially, I received some helpful responses from dhj and David-san.
However, to my surprise, the post itself became “unlisted” to the public shortly thereafter. When I inquired about this, the replies suddenly stopped altogether. The last reply was 15 days ago. It’s been frustrating – now, with my trial period expired, I can’t test the software further, and the lack of access to help from the community leaves me feeling quite disappointed and muted.
Here is the original post link:
Despite this setback, I’m still very interested in Gig Performer. The initial learning curve was exciting, and I was genuinely prepared to invest more time and money into the software. However, the situation with the unlisted topic has left me hesitant to purchase. Is there a more appropriate way to raise latency/bug concerns within the Gig Performer community forums?
I’d appreciate any clarification on how these types of issues are typically handled. Your help would be greatly appreciated!
